Showing posts with label test. Show all posts
Showing posts with label test. Show all posts
Wednesday, March 29, 2017
New Trojan OSX CoinThief A New Anti Malware Effectiveness Test Results
New Trojan OSX CoinThief A New Anti Malware Effectiveness Test Results
--
New CoinThief malware
CoinThief.A was first reported by SecureMac here:
New Apple Mac Trojan Called OSX/CoinThief Discovered
+ + +
Also of interest at Thomass The Safe Mac site is his recent article:
Mac anti-virus testing 2014
Thomas tested 20 anti-malware programs, from free to paid, against 188 Mac malware samples and compared the results. If youre looking for the best options in Mac anti-malware, his article is an excellent place to start.
I was pleased to see that Integos Virus Barrier topped this list. It remains my favorite of the paid anti-malware applications for both usability and the dedication of their staff to Mac security. But I must point out that Sophos free single-user anti-malware application did very well. Sophos also remains dedicated to Mac security.
I continue to be disappointed that the ClamAV project doesnt take Mac security entirely seriously. Everyone involved with ClamXav has done and still does their utmost to get every possible Mac malware signature into ClamAV, several times over. That includes Mark Allan and friends, such as Thomas Reed and myself. *sigh*
--
Security Spreads Anti-Malware Tests:
For further details, here is a whopping huge chart of various anti-malware applications versus specific malware samples, both inert and active:
http://securityspread.com/detection-rate-results/
If youre going to pour over their most recent testing chart, I suggest downloading its PDF first as it can be very annoying to read via web browsers.
I find some of the samples in Security Spreads testing to be unusual if not silly. For example, the Opener script was never anything but a concept. It never qualified as actual malware. The list also offers no malware strain delineation. Then theres the inexplicable inclusion of anti-malware application MacKeeper, which I would never recommend as an option due to their predatory, deceitful marketing strategies as well as consistent reports of it being more deleterious than helpful to Mac usability. As usual, it pays to shop around and compare malware lists, test results and the reputations of the folks doing the testing.
Anyway, its good to see Integos Virus Barrier again was at the top of the list in Security Spreads testing.
--
Malware Lists:
Of slight interest, here is Security Spreads rendition of the history of Mac malware:
http://securityspread.com/history-of-mac-malware/
This list is by no means complete! The list of Mac OS (pre-Mac OS X) malware is worthless. Nearly 50 malware are missing. (o_0) Many of the listed OS X era malware were mere proof-of-concept malware, never found in the wild. Again, there is no listing of malware strains is provided. Their naming protocol for malware is incomplete and provides no transmission vector indication. And so forth. But its a list of sorts and is therefore sort of useful.
Thomas Reed provides his own list of OS X malware at his The Safe Mac website:
http://www.thesafemac.com/mmg-catalog/
I keep my own personal list of OS X malware, but it too is not perfect. I keep it in order to have a historical count of Mac malware as well as to provide a file system where I can store related malware articles as I find them. However, Ive discovered that posting such a list is beyond the intentional scope of this blog, so I no longer bother to collate it for public viewing. Instead, Thomas Reed and I share notes and I leave the public list maintenance to him. (Thank you Thomas!)
Another drawback about such lists is that, with time, malware becomes inert on various versions of OS X. For example, anyone with OS X 10.6.8 and above has Apples XProtect system installed as part of the system. XProtect has made a vast variety of OS X malware inert. This means that for those versions of OS X, theres very little active malware in the wild. The only reason I posted this article about CoinThief.A is that XProtect has not yet (as of this moment anyway) been updated to identify it on Mac systems. CoinThief.A and the newly discovered Crisis.C would literally be the only two OS X malware on any up-to-date active Mac malware list at this moment. Therefore, I prefer simple blog posting alerts about new malware.
Bored yet? I find this stuff interesting. Be glad I dont dump the gory details on you. Some of that stuff puts me to sleep. Happy dreams ~ ~ ~
:-Derek
--
[Credits: The creepy hand used in the Bitcoin graphic I concocted is by ze ice. The original can be found here:
http://fc02.deviantart.net/fs70/i/2011/313/b/9/creepy_hand_by_ze_ice-d4eb3yx.jpg]
Go to link Download
Wednesday, September 28, 2016
New Pencil Test
New Pencil Test
A few people have been bugging me to put up more pencil tests. Ive wanted to put up some Curious George stuff, but i figured id wait till it had its run in the theaters. Just to play it safe. This was a fun shot to do... in retro spect, i would have done some stuff differently but this was done in the crunch of the film and i didnt have a lot of "searching time". I only had a week to do it and its mostly on 1s as you can see. I think it turned out ok, but as we learn and grow our work just seems to get dated huh? at least mine feels that way to me. Whenever I can, I love to move the character in and out of the foreground. We as hand drawn animators already have the challenge of making people forget about the fact that they are watching drawings so this depth can help with it. CG has had a positive affect i think in this way that they have forced us not to cheat. CG can obviously do all the technical stuff automatically, but in handdrawn it takes real skill to do these things. I think CG has forced us to not fudge anything to keep up... personally i think it has been a good thing.
On another note i got my copy of King Kong! Im one of those types who watches DVDs, or rather listens to them as he works. I get a little obsessive about new films. Especially ones from directors and studio i highly respect. The same has been true of watching King Kong. I know the reaction was kinda mixed, but i loved it and still do now. That T-Rex fight is pretty freaking amazing man-- geez, talk about clear staging and knowing where you are from cut to cut. Those guys know what theyre doing thats for sure. but for anyone who knows me knows i am a sucker for the tender parts even more so... i cant get any work done when those parts come on man. I just have to abandon myself to it, get sucked into it, and start to feel something. Maybe someday ill get that chance to animate something really tender, as well as some kick boot-tay action sequence!
This kinda brings me to another thought that ive shared repeatedly. I wanna see hand drawn animation do something like this again. I think Iron Giant had a lot of what im talking about... heartfelt moments (the climax of the film), cool action stuff (when the Giant goes bazurk!) and fun humor (playing in the lake). Oh PLEASE Brad, come here and make Ray Gunn. You gotta man!!
Anyhow, enjoy the pencil test and have a great weekend everyone!
Go to link Download
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)